Biotic ligand model, a flexible tool for developing site-specific water quality guidelines for metals.

By S. Niyogi, C. Wood. Environmental Science and Technology, 2004

689 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c58f44dc08db64509bf34f79865ac088fe74c28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. C. Brauner
2. A. Farrell
3. N. Yan
4. C. Wood
5. A. Jeziorski

In Pollution

1. C. Brauner
2. A. Farrell
3. C. Wood

In Water Science and Technology

1. C. Brauner
2. A. Farrell
3. C. Wood

Citations in the corpus

• Homeostasis and toxicology of essential metals (2012, methodology): “Together, the GSIM and FIAM provided the theoretical framework for the modern biotic ligand models (BLMs) (Paquin et al., 2000, 2002; McGeer et al., 2000; Di Toro et al., 2001; Santore et al., 2001; Niyogi and Wood, 2004a; Paquin et al., Chapter 9, Vol. 31B).”
• Species identity and aqueous calcium concentrations as determinants of calcium concentrations of freshwater crustacean zooplankton (2006, background): “, amphipods, crayfish, and molluscs) have been affected by the Ca decline, and (iii) if declining Ca availability might affect the sensitivity of aquatic organisms to other stressors such as ultraviolet radiation (Hessen and Rukke 2000), metals (Niyogi and Wood 2004), and climate warming.”