The resource curse hypothesis and its transmission channels

By E. Papyrakis, Reyer Gerlagh. 2004

808 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c45f58f8e0eef7451da5e166354bfccf2ddef9c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. E. Papyrakis
2. Atsushi Iimi
3. F. van der ploeg
4. Shuai Shao
5. Lili Yang
6. V. Daniele
7. Brock Smith
8. L. Cockx

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Muhammad Shahbaz
2. E. Papyrakis
3. Shuai Shao
4. Lili Yang
5. Nanthakumar Loganathan
6. R. Horvath
7. Tomáš Havránek
8. V. Daniele

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Atsushi Iimi
2. F. van der ploeg
3. Shuai Shao
4. Lili Yang
5. Brock Smith
6. E. Papyrakis
7. V. Daniele
8. Robert M. Ewers

Citations in the corpus

• Dutch Disease Scare in Kazakhstan: Is it real? (2008, background): “They focus on large cross-sectional datasets to analyze the determinants of long-run growth (Sachs and Warner, 1995; Kronenberg, 2004; Papyrakis and Gerlagh, 2004; Davoodi, 2005).”
• Did Botswana Escape from the Resource Curse? (2006, background): “In ealier empirical work, natural resource richness is usually measured by resource exports due to data availability (e.g., Sachs and Warner, 1995; Papyrakis and Gerlagh, 2004 ).”
• The Resource Curse Exorcised: Evidence from a Panel of Countries (2015, background): “Other papers have argued that low levels of human capital (Gylfason 2001, Papyrakis & Gerlagh 2004, Ortega & Gregorio 2005), lack of investment (Atkinson & Hamilton 2004), and increased risk of civil war (Collier & Hoeffler 1998) also play a role.”
• Is Natural Resource Abundance a Stimulus for Financial Development in the USA (2017, background): “Moreover, Papyrakis and Gerlagh (2004, 2007) also reported the negative relationship between natural resource extractions and investments in human capital.”
• The role of country-level institutional factors in escaping the natural resource curse: Insights from Ghana (2019, background): “The widely researched issue on the ‘natural resourcecurse’ hypothesis (Atkinson and Hamilton, 2003; Papyrakis and Gerlagh, 2004; Kopiński et al., 2013; Satti et al., 2014) also called ‘the paradox of plenty’ (Karl, 1997) assumes that developing countries that are rich in natural resources (Mikesell,”
• Natural Resources and Economic Development: New Panel Evidence (2015, background): “Although the details vary, the vast majority of the literature produces clear evidence of a resource curse (Sala-i-Martin 1997; Papyrakis and Gerlagh 2004, 2007; Bulte et al. 2005; Ding and Field 2005; Arezki and Ploeg 2011) and provides evidence that the curse primarily operates by undermining the…”
• The evolution of the natural resource curse thesis: A critical literature survey (2017, background): “Papyrakis and Gerlagh (2007) for the United States; Pegg (2010) for Botswana; De Gregorio and Labbe”