Multiple solutions for quasi-linear PDEs involving the critical Sobolev and Hardy exponents
By Nassif Ghoussoub, C. Yuan. 2000
552 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9c2745fd472227399688a02d84d8d54118dac639
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
In Mathematical Physics
Citations in the corpus
- The critical hyperbola for a Hamiltonian elliptic system with weights (2008, result): “Results of existence, non-existence and multiplicity for elliptic equations involving weights could be found, among other papers, in [1–5,9,10,25 ]a nd [ 27 ].”
- Sharp Constants and Optimizers for a Class of Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg Inequalities (2015, background): “[27] Ghoussoub, N.; Yuan, C. Multiple solutions for quasi-linear PDEs involving the critical Sobolev and Hardy exponents.”
- Existence and non-existence of solutions to elliptic equations related to the Caffarelli–Kohn–Nirenberg inequalities (2007, unknown): “More results can be found in [7, 15, 18, 19, 20, 22].”
- Concentration estimates for Emden-Fowler equations with boundary singularities and critical growth (2005, background): “More precisely, we need the principal curvatures of ∂Ω at 0 to be non-positive but not all vanishing.”
- Multiplicity of solutions for quasilinear elliptic problems involving critical Sobolev exponents (2003, unknown): “The Theorem B extends the multiplicity of solutions in [14] to the case p 0 is a consequence of a recent result due to Ghoussoub and Yuan [ 15 ].”
- Nonlocal problems with critical Hardy nonlinearity (2017, background): “Even if not needed, proceeding as in [10] it can be proved that actually c1,ρ → c1,0.”
- A note on the sign-changing solutions to elliptic problems with critical Sobolev and Hardy terms $ (2003, methodology): “In fact, a subsequence of unn converges strongly to u in H 1 0 ðOÞ: To see this, notice c2;n-c2;0 (similar to that in [9]), it is easy to verify that funng is actually a Palais-Smale sequence for J0 at level c2;0: So by the fact that limn-N c1;nn 1⁄4 c1:0 and Lemma 2.”