Galaxy morphology and star formation in the Illustris Simulation at z = 0

By Gregory F. Snyder, P. Torrey, J. Lotz, Shy Genel, Cameron McBride, M. Vogelsberger, A. Pillepich, D. Nelson, L. Sales, D. Sijacki and 2 more. 2015

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study how optical galaxy morphology depends on mass and star formation rate (SFR) in the Illustris Simulation. To do so, we measure automated galaxy structures in 10 808 simulated galaxies at z = 0 with stellar masses 10^(9.7) < M_*/M_⊙ < 10^(12.3). We add observational realism to idealized synthetic images and measure non-parametric statistics in rest-frame optical and near-IR images from four directions. We find that Illustris creates a morphologically diverse galaxy population, occupying the observed bulge strength locus and reproducing median morphology trends versus stellar mass, SFR, and compactness. Morphology correlates realistically with rotation, following classification schemes put forth by kinematic surveys. Type fractions as a function of environment agree roughly with data. These results imply that connections among mass, star formation, and galaxy structure arise naturally from models matching global star formation and halo occupation functions when simulated with accurate methods. This raises a question of how to construct experiments on galaxy surveys to better distinguish between models. We predict that at fixed halo mass near 10^(12) M_⊙, disc-dominated galaxies have higher stellar mass than bulge-dominated ones, a possible consequence of the Illustris feedback model. While Illustris galaxies at M_* ∼ 10^(11) M_⊙ have a reasonable size distribution, those at M_* ∼ 10^(10) M_⊙ have half-light radii larger than observed by a factor of 2. Furthermore, at M_* ∼ 10^(10.5)–10^(11) M_⊙, a relevant fraction of Illustris galaxies have distinct 'ring-like' features, such that the bright pixels have an unusually wide spatial extent.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bfe246d62d377338ee9c90a8086d554e59a415a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. Volker Springel
  3. M. Vogelsberger
  4. Shy Genel
  5. P. Torrey
  6. D. Nelson
  7. P. Hopkins
  8. F. Marinacci

In Ecology

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Joel R. Primack
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. J. Lotz
  5. A. Dekel
  6. P. Torrey
  7. A. Pillepich

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Joel R. Primack
  3. A. Dekel
  4. L. Hernquist
  5. D. Ceverino
  6. F. Marinacci
  7. M. Vogelsberger
  8. D. Nelson

Citations in the corpus