Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the Kriging predictor
By H. H. Khodaparast, J. Mottershead, Ken J. Badcock. 2011
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bfe0b01a372cac5ae61e9b74bc7dec71507b835
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Civil and Structural Engineering
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- A comparison of two stochastic model updating methods using the DLR AIRMOD test structure (2015, methodology): “The first identifies mean parameter values and covariances [13] while the second focuses on parameter means and intervals [18].”
- Imprecise probabilities in engineering analyses (2013, unknown): “Further developments can be expected to emerge in the related elds of model updating and system identi cation, in which interval methods have attracted attention recently, as documented by [118] and [119].”
- The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) (2011, background): “Stochastic model updating, as opposed to deterministic model updating - and the statisticalmethod described in the previous paragraphs - is capable of inferring not only themean value of the updating parameters but also their variability (statistically or in terms of intervals) [50–54] frommeasured ”