Tropospheric Ozone Determined from Aura OMI and MLS: Evaluation of Measurements and Comparison with the Global Modeling Initiative's Chemical Transport Model

By J. Ziemke, S. Chandra, B. Duncan, L. Froidevaux, Pawan K. Bhartia, Pieternel F. Levelt, J. Waters. 2006

372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data (2012, neutral): “…but its impact on ozone and associated outgoing longwave radiation is disproportionately large because it is mainly released in the upper troposphere where the lifetimes of NO x and ozone are long [ Pickering et al. , 1990; Hauglustaine et al. , 1994; Zhang et al. , 2003; Choi et al. , 2009].”
Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations (2020, background): “Figure 5 compares the seasonality of TCOs in the model ensemble to that of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument/Microwave Limb Sounder (OMI/MLS) product (Ziemke et al., 2006).”
Validation of Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) nadir ozone profiles (2008, neutral): “1 of 13 Larsen, 1987; Hudson and Thompson, 1998; Ziemke et al., 1998, 2005, 2006].”
Stratospheric variability and tropospheric ozone (2009, methodology): “Waters (2006), Tropospheric ozone determined from Aura OMI and MLS: Evalu609 ation of measurements and comparison with the Global Modeling Initiative’s Chemical 610 Transport Model, J.”