Developmental system drift and flexibility in evolutionary trajectories

By J. True, Eric Haag. Evolution & Development, 2001

678 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Geometry and Topology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bc45f05333c05d140a209a9755709a8ae4a878f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. Daniel E. L. Promislow
2. M. Siegal
3. Aviv Bergman
4. Robert D. Leclerc

Citations in the corpus

• The QTN Program and the Alleles That Matter for Evolution: All That’s Gold Does Not Glitter (2011, neutral): “Variation in MHC is incapable of contributing to phenotypic divergence in these traits, however, because its allelic variation is maintained by tremendously powerful balancing selection (Hedrick 1999) and the disease alleles may be unconditionally deleterious sheltered load (van Oosterhout 2009).”
• Functional and evolutionary inference in gene networks: does topology matter? (2006, background): “Thus, a resolution to our original paradox presents itself in what has been termed ‘developmental system drift’ ( True and Haag 2001 ).”