The clinico‐radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited

By Frederik Barkhof. Current Opinion in Neurology, 2002

756 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bb9b630b84ca4dfbe1092439a405e2e7f36d4a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Marvin M. Doyley

In Neurology

1. Patrik Vuilleumier

Citations in the corpus

• MR-elastography reveals degradation of tissue integrity in multiple sclerosis (2010, background): “Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the most important paraclinical tool for diagnosis and monitoring of MS, conventional MRI parameters correlate only modestly with the clinical course and neurological disability (Barkhof, 2002).”
• Principal components of functional connectivity: A new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest (2013, background): “MS is usually accompanied by sensory or motor deficits and cognitive impairment, but the correlation between clinical disability and focal lesions visible in structural MRI is poor (Barkhof, 2002; Filippi and Agosta, 2010).”
• Regional DTI differences in multiple sclerosis patients (2009, neutral): “This is one of the main reasons why the association between MRI-visible abnormalities and MS clinical disability is only weak (Barkhof, 2002).”
• Structural connectomics in brain diseases (2013, neutral): “Hence, it is often difficult to make predictions about the eloquence of the lesion and the type and severity of functional deficits (Barkhof, 2002).”