Eluding carnivores: file sharing with strong anonymity

By Emin Gün Sirer, Sharad Goel, Mark E. Robson, Dogan Engin. 2004

50 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Computer Networks and Communications

Citations in the corpus

Riffle (2016, background): “Previous works [30, 48] have explored these problems in detail, and their solutions are applicable to Riffle as well.”
Proactively Accountable Anonymous Messaging in Verdict (2012, background): “Dining cryptographers networks [13] (DC-nets) promise security even against traffic analysis attacks, and recent systems such as Herbivore [24, 44] and Dissent [14, 52] have improved the scalability of DC-netstyle systems.”
SplitX: high-performance private analytics (2013, unknown): “A number of systems utilize the XOR operation [8,29,33], or matrix multiplication [21] to achieve low-cost anonymization without public-key operations.”
This Paper Is Included in the Proceedings of the 12th Usenix Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (osdi '16). Unobservable Communication over Fully Untrusted Infrastructure Unobservable Communication over Fully Untrusted Infrastructure (unknown): “There are proposals that do not require trusting the communication infrastructure [26] [33] [42] [60] [66] [131], but they have been primarily theoretical since the resulting systems support only dozens of concurrent users.”
SGX-LKL: Securing the Host OS Interface for Trusted Execution (2019, background): “Dining Cryptographers (DC) networks [18, 88, 106] provide stronger guarantees by broad-casting messages to all users, but incur a high overhead.”
Dissent: accountable anonymous group messaging (2010, background): “Dissent’s bulk protocol builds on DC-nets [10,22,32,40] to transmit variable-length messages anonymously.”
Dissent in Numbers: Making Strong Anonymity Scale (2012, unknown): “Herbivore [35, 49] supports mass participation by securely dividing large networks into smaller DC-nets groups, but guarantees each node anonymity only within its own group, showing scalability only to 40-node groups.”
Hang with your buddies to resist intersection attacks (2013, unknown): “Buddies’ architecture may be treated as an extension to various existing anonymous communication schemes, but is most well-suited to schemes already offering some measurable protection guarantees against traffic analyis, such as MIX cascades [24, 1], DC-nets [3, 29, 32], or verifiable shuffles [22, ”