Economics of biofortification

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Biofortification: Progress toward a more nourishing future (2013, background): “the dimensions of which are and cost-effective way (Bouis, 1999; Nestel et al., 2006; Pfeiffer and McClafferty, 2007; Qaim et al., 2007; Meenakshi et al., 2010).”
The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops (2009, background): “Significant economic and health benefits can also be expected for other biofortified crops, such as iron- and zinc-dense staple foods or crops containing higher amounts of essential amino acids (Qaim et al. 2007).”
A meta-analysis of community-based studies on quality protein maize (2010, background): “Adoption rates are influenced by local adaptation of the biofortified varieties, but also seed distribution channels and farmers’ seed replacement rates; consumer acceptance is influenced by awareness, but also by other traits appreciated by consumers such as taste, texture, and visual appearance (Q”
Genetic Improvement of Pearl Millet in India (2013, background): “8 million DALYs due to Zn deficiency [72].”