The watching eyes phenomenon: The role of a sense of being seen and public self‐awareness

By Stefan Pfattheicher, Johannes Keller. 2015

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bac0f0d92d7818b7598ac83ee23b67ad6025080

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. P. V. van Lange
2. Daniel Balliet

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Stefanie B. Northover
2. William C. Pedersen
3. P. V. van Lange
4. Adam B. Cohen
5. Daniel Balliet
6. Junhui Wu
7. P. Andrews

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Daniel Balliet
2. P. V. van Lange
3. Stefanie B. Northover
4. William C. Pedersen
5. Adam B. Cohen
6. Junhui Wu
7. P. Andrews

Citations in the corpus

• Reputation, Gossip, and Human Cooperation (2016, background): “12255 directly watching (Manesi, Van Lange, & Pollet, in press) and when there is strong chronic public self-awareness (Pfattheicher & Keller, 2015).”
• Artificial surveillance cues do not increase generosity: two meta-analyses (2017, background): “…[−2.63, 0.97] Pfattheicher (2015) Study 2 Sample 1 Charity donation 100 0.48 −0.57 [−1.52, 0.38] Pfattheicher (2015) Study 2 Sample 2 Dictator game 123 0.37 −0.40 [−1.12, 0.32] Pfattheicher and Keller (2015) Study 2 Charity donation 126 0.38 0.12 [−0.62, 0.86] Vogt et al. (2015) Dictator game…”