Comparison of phenolic compounds and the effects of invasive and native species in East Asia: support for the novel weapons hypothesis

By Yong Ok Kim, Eun Ju Lee. Ecological research, 2010

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Enhanced allelopathy and competitive ability of invasive plant Solidago canadensis in its introduced range (2013, background): “2006; Mert-Türk 2006), which are known to play important roles in plant defense and allelopathic inhibition (Elliger et al. 1980; Inderjit 1996; Harborne and Williams 2000; Mert-Türk 2006; Kim and Lee 2011).”
Allelopathic effects of three plant invaders on germination of native species: a field study (2013, unknown): “…often differ from native species in their prominent secondary compounds (Barto et al. 2010; Cappuccino and Arnason 2006), but the relevance of these differences for the success of invasive plant species remains controversial (Kim and Lee 2011; Lind and Parker 2010; Scharfy et al. 2010; Stowe 1979).”
Allelopathy: a tool for weed management in forest restoration (2012, background): “Some allelochemicals can even promote the growth of species that share a coevolutionary history (Kim and Lee 2011).”
Invasive species grows faster, competes better, and shows greater evolution toward increased seed size and growth than exotic non-invasive congeners (2012, background): “2008; Reinhart and Callaway 2006; Vilà and Weiner 2004), through traits that differ from those of natives and to which natives may not have adapted (Inderjit et al. 2011; Kim and Lee 2010), or through selection for stronger competitive ability in non-native ranges (Ridenour et al.”