Cycle versus voltage hold – Which is the better stability test for electrochemical double layer capacitors?
By D. Weingarth, A. Foelske-Schmitz, R. Kötz. 2013
233 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Polymers and Plastics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b940a7f6a1acc1a550db0867191a613ff1514af
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- H. Zanin
- Cássio M.R. Moreira
- Yat Li
- Lindomar G. De Souza
- B. Pires
- Tianyu Liu
- R. Cesar
- L. M. da Silva
In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Tianyu Liu
- Yat Li
- H. Zanin
- Cássio M.R. Moreira
- Lindomar G. De Souza
- B. Pires
- R. Cesar
- L. M. da Silva
In Polymers and Plastics
- Tianyu Liu
- Yat Li
- H. Zanin
- Cássio M.R. Moreira
- Lindomar G. De Souza
- B. Pires
- R. Cesar
- L. M. da Silva
Citations in the corpus
- Reviewing the fundamentals of supercapacitors and the difficulties involving the analysis of the electrochemical findings obtained for porous electrode materials (2020, methodology): “Despite these considerations, R and, mainly, C may exhibit different values depending on the type of experiment performed (e.g., CV, EIS, and GCD) [374,375].”
- Addressing the Achilles' heel of pseudocapacitive materials: Long‐term stability (2020, methodology): “The widely accepted criteria for the end-of-life of a supercapacitor are defined as the time when 20% capacitance is lost or the internal resistance doubles.(22,23) In laboratories, cyclic voltammetry (CV, Figure 2A) and galvanostatic (or constant-current) chargedischarge (GCD) tests (Figure 2B) are”