Value Structures behind Proenvironmental Behavior

By A. Nordlund, J. Garvill. 2002

992 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b8fd51078bbab60c2c7609a8c08214aaa9652bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behavior in Rural American Communities (2015, background): “Raymond et al. (2010) developed a model that indicates that nature bonding, social strong attachment, and physical and social characteristics of place all have important roles to play in place identity and dependence.”
Testing VBN theory in Japan: Relationships between values, beliefs, norms, and acceptability and expected effects of a car pricing policy (2018, background): “It is generally believed that values influence behaviour mostly indirectly, through more specific beliefs, attitudes, and norms (e.g., Ajzen & Fishbein, 1972; Dietz, 2015; Feather, 1995; Fujii & Taniguchi, 2014; Nordlund & Garvill, 2002, 2003; Oreg & Katz-Gerro, 2006).”
The value–belief–emotion–norm model: investigating customers’ eco-friendly behavior (2017, background): “…a sequential process in generating pro-social/pro-environmental intention/behavior (problem awareness → ascribed responsibility → personal norm → intention/behavior) (see for example De Groot & Steg, 2009; Nordlund & Garvill, 2002, 2003; Onwezen et al., 2013; Schwartz & Howard, 1981; Stern, 2000).”
Understanding the internal processes of behavioral engagement in a national park: A latent variable path analysis of the value-belief-norm theory (2014, methodology): “This conceptualization of variables is supported by past research (Karp, 1996; Norlund & Garvill, 2002; Schultz & Zelezny, 1999; Schwartz, 1994; Stern & Dietz, 1994).”
Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior (2005, methodology): “In recent years, a number of studies have examined the link between values and environmental attitudes (Grunert & Juhl, 1995; Nordlund & Garvill, 2002; Schultz & Zelezny, 2003; Stern, Dietz, Abel, Guagnano, & Kalof, 1999; Tankha, 1998).”
A Twenty-First Century Assessment of Values Across the Global Workforce (2011, background): “Of these, the collectivism and individualism dimensional set had the stronger support, which is a finding consistent with the importance attributed to these dimensions in other cross-cultural values instruments (Oyserman et al. 2002).”
Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness (2006, background): “More comprehensively, Nordlund and Garvill (2003) demonstrate the importance of collective values (emphasizing the collective’s interests above one’s own interests), ecocentric values, and problem awareness for a personal norm, which in turn is positively related to willingness to reduce car use.”
Influence of interpretation on conservation intentions of whale tourists (2014, background): “Empirical research found that pro-environmental values predict environmental intentions to some extent (e.g. Cameron, Brown, & Chapman, 1998; Karp, 1996; Nordlund & Garvill, 2002).”
Household energy requirement and value patterns (2007, background): “Nordlund and Garvill (2002) quote many studies in which relationships are confirmed between factors such as value orientation and specific pro-environmental behaviours like recycling and buying ecologically produced products.”