Global potential for carbon sequestration: Geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Impacts of incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation on global species extinctions (2012, methodology): “Benítez-Ponce P, Mc Callum I, Obersteiner M, Yamagata Y (2004) Global supply for carbon sequestration: identifying least-cost afforestation sites under country risk considerations (IIASA Interim Report) (IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria).”
Global Cost of Land Degradation (2016, background): “For example, reforestation costs are lower in low income regions than in high income countries (Benítez et al. 2007).”
Policy design for forest carbon sequestration: A review of the literature (2016, background): “Studies considering uncertainty in carbon sink where policy makers allocate risk among different abatement and carbon sink options (e.g., Benitez et al., 2007; Fuss et al., 2013; Gren and Carlsson, 2013; Haim et al., 2014) are also excluded, unless they contain explicit policy design for carbon…”
Voluntary Carbon Offsetting Schemes for Aviation: Efficiency, Credibility and Sustainable Tourism (2007, background): “Moreover, monocultures for fuel production would only support low levels of biodiversity, and the effectiveness of afforestation must be assessed, particularly in developing countries, against political stability, social and other environmental aspects (B¨ ackstrand & Lovbrand, 2006; Benitez et al.”