Intimacy, Differentiation, and Personality Variables as Predictors of Marital Satisfaction

By Shawn Patrick, James Sells, F. Giordano, T. Tollerud. 2007

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b70008d3fbf1488f51094b1fbc6bc6f6ec4feab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Peter Ward
2. Neil R. Lundberg
3. Kristen Berrett
4. R. Zabriskie

In Social Psychology

1. Neil R. Lundberg
2. Peter Ward
3. Kristen Berrett
4. R. Zabriskie
5. P. Freeman

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring Marital Satisfaction: A Comparison of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Satisfaction with Married Life Scale (2009, background): “One of these challenges has been reaching a general consensus about what marital satisfaction consists of and how to best psychometrically capture this construct (Bradbury et al, 2000 ; Hamilton, 1948 ; Jones, Adams, Monroe, & Berry, 1995 ; Patrick, Sells, Giordano, & Tollerud, 2007 ).”
• Emotional intimacy, sexual desire, and sexual satisfaction among partnered heterosexual men (2014, background): “…used a conceptualization of intimacy that favors communication and expression of affection – which are traditionally the domains of women’s relational expertise – possibly ignoring the specific meanings of intimacy among men (Ferreira et al., 2012; Patrick et al., 2007; Patrick & Beckenbach, 2009).”