The Architecture of Proposed REDD Schemes After Bali: Facing Critical Choices

By Alain Karsenty. 2008

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b5ee30026ee808304fcda2ff6ca4dcc0e59b543

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

The Policy Challenges for Green Economy and Sustainable Economic Development (2011, background): “Monitoring and verifying changes in deforestation rates in developing countries and their impacts on carbon emissions could increase substantially the transaction costs of implementing a REDD scheme on a global scale (Karsenty, 2008; Kindermann et al., 2008; Olander et al., 2008).”
REDD and forest transition: Tunneling through the environmental Kuznets curve (2012, background): “The forest transition hypothesis argues that it is unlikely that the rate of deforestation will continue to increase over time, as the opportunity costs of deforestation rises with increased forest scarcity (Damette and Delacote, 2009; Ewers, 2006; Karsenty, 2008).”
A political ecology of REDD+: property rights, militarised protectionism, and carbonised exclusion in Cross River (2016, background): “…largely effaces important political economic details, tells us too little about how and why property rights and access are changing under REDD+, whose interest is served by these changes, who benefits, who loses, and how is the environment transformed in the process (Karsenty, 2008; Osborne, 2015).”
Incentives to Sustain Forest Ecosystem Services: A Review and Lessons for REDD (2009, background): “16 to argue that baseline scenarios are ‘more likely to resemble random scenarios than anything else’ (Karsenty 2008).”
Rights to Land, Forests and Carbon in REDD+: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica (2011, background): “This is probably explained by the fact that such plans should count with the committed endorsement of local authorities, forestry officers and national and local elites and may in turn involve challenging the status quo [4,110].”