The trees and the forest: Characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees.

By Cornelis J. Stam, Prejaas Kavish Baldewpersad Tewarie, Edwin van Dellen, Elisabeth C. W. van Straaten, Arjan Hillebrand, Piet Van Mieghem. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2014

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b5b2dcbc13db989f404cc25f721e81d49a07bca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Jan Pukropski
2. R. von Wrede
3. Klaus Lehnertz
4. T. Rings
5. T. Bröhl

Citations in the corpus

• The minimum spanning tree: An unbiased method for brain network analysis (2015, neutral): “…applied to brain networks by Lee et al. (2006), and has been used in several recent studies on development and neuropsychiatric diseases (Boersma et al., 2012; Demuru et al., 2013; Olde Dubbelink et al., 2014; Ortega et al., 2008; Tewarie et al., 2013a; van Dellen et al., 2014; Stam et al., 2014).”
• The time-evolving epileptic brain network: concepts, definitions, accomplishments, perspectives (2024, background): “…of reviews [see, e.g. ( Richardson, 2010; Kramer and Cash, 2012; Laufs, 2012; Engel et al., 2013; van Diessen et al., 2013; Chiang and Haneef, 2014; Stam, 2014; van Mierlo et al., 2014; Bernhardt et al., 2015; Bartolomei et al., 2017; Zijlmans et al., 2019; Gil et al., 2020; Royer et al., 2022a)].”