Quantifiers in language and logic

By S. Peters, D. Westerståhl. 2006

420 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b464dc00a25f39c70e91c57899886ca36aca25b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Andrew J Koontz-Garboden
2. Itamar Francez
3. J. Benthem
4. Sonja Smets
5. Alexandru Baltag

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Andrew J Koontz-Garboden
2. Itamar Francez
3. J. Benthem

In Language and Linguistics

1. Andrew J Koontz-Garboden
2. Itamar Francez
3. J. Benthem

Citations in the corpus

• A brief history of natural logic (2008, background): “For further information on Generalized Quantifier Theory, cf. Peters & Westerståhl 2006.”
• Compositionality I: Definitions and Variants (2010, background): “17A possible example, from Peters and Westerst̊ahl 2006, ch. 7, concerns possessive determiner phrases like some student’s, taken to be generated by (NP-rule) above and Det −→ NP ’s (Poss) If the semantic value of the Det in (NP-rule) is a type 〈1, 1〉 quantifier Q and the value of N is a set C, the…”
• Semantic variation and the grammar of property concepts (2015, methodology): “Consistent with our usage so far, P,Q are used as variables over such substances, and English nominalizations in boldface as substance constants.”