Towards fault-tolerant quantum computing with trapped ions

By J. Benhelm, G. Kirchmair, C. F. Roos, Rainer Blatt. 2008

478 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Like their classical counterparts, quantum computers can, in theory, cope with imperfections—provided that these are small enough. The regime of fault-tolerant quantum computing has now been reached for a system based on trapped ions, in which a gate operation for entangling qubits has been implemented with a fidelity exceeding 99%. Today, ion traps are among the most promising physical systems for constructing a quantum device harnessing the computing power inherent in the laws of quantum physics1,2. For the implementation of arbitrary operations, a quantum computer requires a universal set of quantum logic gates. As in classical models of computation, quantum error correction techniques3,4 enable rectification of small imperfections in gate operations, thus enabling perfect computation in the presence of noise. For fault-tolerant computation5, it is believed that error thresholds ranging between 10−4 and 10−2 will be required—depending on the noise model and the computational overhead for realizing the quantum gates6,7,8—but so far all experimental implementations have fallen short of these requirements. Here, we report on a Molmer–Sorensen-type gate operation9,10 entangling ions with a fidelity of 99.3(1)%. The gate is carried out on a pair of qubits encoded in two trapped calcium ions using an amplitude-modulated laser beam interacting with both ions at the same time. A robust gate operation, mapping separable states onto maximally entangled states is achieved by adiabatically switching the laser–ion coupling on and off. We analyse the performance of a single gate and concatenations of up to 21 gate operations.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b264b0ca5b4526880a0f9a2aec695b53312c3c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Franco Nori
  2. Mark Saffman
  3. Mikhail D. Lukin
  4. Sahel Ashhab
  5. Peter Zoller
  6. Rainer Blatt
  7. Christopher R. Monroe
  8. Alán Aspuru-Guzik

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Franco Nori
  2. Mark Saffman
  3. Sahel Ashhab
  4. Mikhail D. Lukin
  5. Peter Zoller
  6. Rainer Blatt
  7. Christopher R. Monroe
  8. C. F. Roos

Citations in the corpus