Wasserstein Barycenter and Its Application to Texture Mixing
By Julien Rabin, G. Peyr'e, Julie Delon, Marc Bernot. 2011
767 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Mathematical Optimization
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Mohammad Rostami
- Marco Cuturi
- G. Peyr'e
- Soheil Kolouri
- Alain Rakotomamonjy
- Gustavo Kunde Rohde
- Carlo Ciliberto
- Rémi Flamary
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Mohammad Rostami
- Luc Van Gool
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Dacheng Tao
- Daniel Cohen-Or
- Chen Change Loy
- Trevor Darrell
- Xiaogang Wang
In Mathematical Optimization
- Mohammad Rostami
- Soheil Kolouri
- G. Peyr'e
- François-Pierre Paty
- Kyungnam Kim
- Gustavo Kunde Rohde
- Marco Cuturi
- Arnaud Doucet
Citations in the corpus
- Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variation (2017, methodology): “imate the statistical similarity by computing their sliced Wasserstein distance SWD(fxl i g;fyl i g), an efficiently computable randomized approximation to earthmovers distance, using 512 projections (Rabin et al., 2011). Intuitively a small Wasserstein distance indicates that the distribution of the”
- Unsupervised Model Adaptation for Continual Semantic Segmentation (2020, methodology): “SWD approximates WD as a summation of WD between a number of random one-dimensional projections: D(p̂J , pT ) ≈ 1 L L∑ l=1 M∑ i=1 |〈γl, zppl[i]〉 − 〈γl, ψ(φ(x t tl[i] ))〉|2 (5) where γl ∈ Sf−1 is uniformly drawn random sample from the unit f -dimensional ball Sf−1, and pl[i] and tl[i] are the sorted ”
- Designing an encoder for StyleGAN image manipulation (2021, methodology): “Note that FID and SWD measure perceptual quality for both reconstruction and editability.”
- Sliced Score Matching: A Scalable Approach to Density and Score Estimation (2019, methodology): “Inspired by the idea of Sliced Wasserstein distance (Rabin et al., 2012), we consider projecting s d ( x ) and s m ( x ; θ ) onto some random direction v and propose to compare their average difference along that random direction.”
- Computational Optimal Transport (2018, methodology): “They have been used for image processing [Rabin et al., 2011], in particular color modification [Solomon et al.”
- Theoretical Analysis of Domain Adaptation with Optimal Transport (2016, methodology): “It turns out that the Wasserstein distance has been successfully used in various applications, for instance: computer vision [22], texture analysis [21], tomographic reconstruction [12] and clustering [9].”
- Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptation (2014, background): “In this section, we present the general unsupervised domain adaptation problem and show how it can be addressed from an optimal transport perspective.”
- Sinkhorn Barycenters with Free Support via Frank-Wolfe Algorithm (2019, methodology): “In particular, Wasserstein barycenters have been successfully used in settings such as texture mixing [40], Bayesian inference [49], imaging [26], or model ensemble [18].”
- Multi-marginal optimal transport: theory and applications (2014, methodology): “These include texture mixing in image processing, where the aim is to interpolate among several textures (encoded as measures) in order to synthesize a new one [69], and statistics, where the basic goal is to find an average among several distributions while preserving relevant features of them [6].”
- Deep Transfer Learning for Few-Shot SAR Image Classification (2019, methodology): “In this paper, we use the Sliced Wasserstein Distance (SWD) to circumvent this challenge.”
- Subspace Robust Wasserstein distances (2019, methodology): “The sliced approximation of OT (Rabin et al., 2011) consists in projecting two probability distributions on a given line, compute the optimal transport cost between these projected values, and then repeat this procedure to average these distances over several random lines.”
- Fast Computation of Wasserstein Barycenters (2013, methodology): “Rabin et al. (2012) were to our knowledge the first to consider practical approaches to compute Wasserstein barycen-ters between point clouds in R d .”
- Data Augmentation for Deep-Learning-Based Electroencephalography. (2020, result): “All reviewed papers that used GAN as their DA technique Study Dataset Task information Input formulation Deep learning strategy Best Performance Augmented Size Accuracy (without DA) Accuracy (with DA) [61] BCI competition II dataset III 1 subject 280trials 3 channels 2 class Motor Imaginary EEG 7-15”
- Low-Rank Subspaces in GANs (2021, methodology): “For metrics, we use Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) [16], Sliced Wasserstein Distance (SWD) [25], and masked Mean Squared Error (MSE).”
- Optimal Transport for Applied Mathematicians: Calculus of Variations, PDEs, and Modeling (2015, methodology): “For the applications of barycenters in image processing, we refer to [256], where, for the sake of numerical computations, the distance W2 is replaced with SW2 (see Section 5.”
- A Fast Proximal Point Method for Computing Wasserstein Distance (2018, background): “Wasserstein barycenter is widely used in machine learning and computer vision due to its nice property [5, 23].”