Plant transposable elements: where genetics meets genomics
By Cédric Feschotte, Ning Jiang, S. Wessler. Nature reviews genetics, 2002
991 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b1396c376df57fb6ef84cdffdec08ca5d079498
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Cédric Feschotte
- R. Velasco
- I. Makarevitch
- Jeffrey A. Fawcett
- Y. Van de Peer
- T. Ryan Gregory
- Ellen J. Pritham
- A. Zharkikh
Citations in the corpus
- Macroevolution, hierarchy theory, and the C-value enigma (2004, background): “More common examples of ‘‘parasitic’’ or ‘‘selfish’’ DNA include the various types of transposable elements (TEs) found within all eukaryotic genomes (for recent reviews, see e.g., Hurst and Werren 2001, Kidwell and Lisch 2001, and Feschotte et al. 2002).”
- The TIGR Plant Repeat Databases: a collective resource for the identification of repetitive sequences in plants (2004, background): “The transposable element super-class includes retrotransposons, transposons and miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) [for recent review see (4)].”
- Transposable elements contribute to activation of maize genes in response to abiotic stress (2014, background): “! Introduction: Transposable elements (TEs), first described as “controlling elements” by Barbara McClintock [1], are now known to make up the majority of angiosperm DNA [2]-[4].”
- Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks (2008, background): “For instance, many miniature inverted repeat transposable elements (MITEs) have a palindromic structure, with terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) joined by little or no spacer DN”
- DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes. (2007, background): “The insertion of DNA transposons may affect host gene expression in myriad ways, the phenotypic consequences of which were richly illustrated by the molecular characterization of a plethora of TE-induced mutations during the first decades of TE research (40, 49, 101, 194).”
- Active DNA Demethylation Mediated by DNA Glycosylases (2009, unknown): “Transposons and other repetitive sequences make up the major parts of large plant genomes, and play important roles in shaping genome structure and in evolution by promoting genetic variability through transposition (6, 26).”
- A High Quality Draft Consensus Sequence of the Genome of a Heterozygous Grapevine Variety (2007, methodology): “The repeats were included in group I (retrotransposons: Copia, Gypsy, LINE) and group II (DNA transposons: Mutator, CACTA, hAT) according to Feschotte et al. [75].”
- Retrotransposons Control Fruit-Specific, Cold-Dependent Accumulation of Anthocyanins in Blood Oranges[W][OA] (2012, background): “…Expression Controls the Expression of Ruby in Blood Orange Retrotransposons can insert within or near transcriptionally active regions and can cause mutations by disrupting genes, altering their expression or driving genomic rearrangements (McClintock, 1984; Feschotte et al., 2002; Shapiro, 2005).”
- Non-coding nuclear DNA markers in phylogenetic reconstruction (2009, background): “Thus, they have been found and studied throughout the plant kingdom (e.g. Flavell et al. 1992; Voytas et al. 1992; Bureau and Wessler 1994; Suoniemi et al. 1998; Kumar and Bennetzen 1999; Noma et al. 1999; Fedoroff 2000; Feschotte et al. 2002).”