The listener as a source of sound change

By J. Ohala. 2012

557 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b0cca7f53886db2c75df376007b134fa77fcadb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

1. Adam Baker
2. Keith Johnson
3. Diana Archangeli
4. Jeff Mielke
5. Andrew Garrett

In Signal Processing

1. Adam Baker
2. Keith Johnson
3. Diana Archangeli
4. Jeff Mielke
5. Andrew Garrett

Citations in the corpus

• Individual-level contact limits phonological complexity: Evidence from bunched and retroflex /ɹ/ (2016, background): “…phonetically natural sound patterns (and their characteristic properties) emerge through the conventionalization of phonetic effects (Hyman 1977, Ohala 1981, 1993, Ladefoged 1984, Labov 1994, 2001, Blevins & Garrett 1998, Bybee 1998, Hume & Johnson 2001, Hale 2003, Janda 2003, Janda & Joseph…”
• Phonetic bias in sound change (2011, background): “Broadly speaking, there are two competing explanations of nonlocal dissimilation.26 As discussed above, the well-known model of Ohala (1981, 1993) explains dissimilation as an effect of perceptual hypercorrection; cf. Gallagher’s (2010) recent study invoking perceptual processing.”