‘Rigour’, ‘Ethical Integrity’ or ‘Artistry’? Reflexively Reviewing Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Research

By L. Finlay. 2006

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Conservation, Occupational Therapy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9b09cd49bc5f8766df725ef4deb00dd9035589b1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. Riley
2. G. Sitharthan
3. L. Clemson
4. Tone Saevi
5. N. Friesen
6. Carina Henriksson
7. M. Diamond

Citations in the corpus

• Hermeneutic Phenomenology in Education: Method and Practice (2012, background): “Broader political, instrumental, or strategic interests cannot be ignored and it behoves phenomenologists to be reflexively aware of the issues at stake when they are presenting their research (Finlay, 2006a).”
• The Needs of Gender-Variant Children and Their Parents: A Parent Survey (2011, background): “Triangulation involves evidence from different sources, ways or means, with each validating the other and coming to the same conclusion (Finlay, 2006; Lincoln & Guba, 1985).”
• Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research (2017, unknown): “Finlay (2006) presents possible methods to engage in and demonstrate quality or trust-worthiness within qualitative research.”