The AKARI/IRC mid-infrared all-sky survey

By D. Ishihara, T. Onaka, H. Kataza, A. Salama, C. Alfageme, A. Cassatella, N. Cox, P. Garcı́a-Lario, C. Stephenson, Marvin L. Cohen and 49 more. 2010

497 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Context. AKARI is the first Japanese astronomical satellite dedicated to infrared astronomy. One of the main purposes of AKARI is the all-sky survey performed with six infrared bands between 9  μ m and 200  μ m during the period from 2006 May 6 to 2007 August 28. In this paper, we present the mid-infrared part (9  μ m and 18  μ m bands) of the survey carried out with one of the on-board instruments, the infrared camera (IRC). Aims. We present unprecedented observational results of the 9  μ m and 18  μ m AKARI all-sky survey and detail the operation and data processing leading to the point source detection and measurements. Methods. The raw data are processed to produce small images for every scan, and the point sources candidates are derived above the 5 σ  noise level per single scan. The celestial coordinates and fluxes of the events are determined statistically and the reliability of their detections is secured through multiple detections of the same source within milli-seconds, hours, and months from each other. Results. The sky coverage is more than 90% for both bands. A total of 877 091 sources (851 189 for 9  μ m, 195 893 for 18  μ m) are confirmed and included in the current release of the point source catalog. The detection limit for point sources is 50 mJy and 90 mJy for the 9  μ m and 18  μ m bands, respectively. The position accuracy is estimated to be better than 2 '' . Uncertainties in the in-flight absolute flux calibration are estimated to be 3% for the 9  μ m band and 4% for the 18  μ m band. The coordinates and fluxes of detected sources in this survey are also compared with those of the IRAS survey and are found to be statistically consistent.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9afd5a7537c0686fc1787a0b7d2bbb399b2daef7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

  1. N. F. Förster Schreiber
  2. Eric Mamajek
  3. D. Calzetti
  4. D. M. Alexander
  5. I. McLean
  6. S. Charlot
  7. H. Dole

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. D. Elbaz
  3. E. Daddi
  4. Mark Dickinson
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. D. Narayanan
  8. C. Casey

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Thomas H. Jarrett
  2. N. F. Förster Schreiber
  3. Eric Mamajek
  4. D. M. Alexander
  5. D. Wilner
  6. M. Brodwin
  7. Lee Armus
  8. S. Charlot

Citations in the corpus