Determination of the enthalpy of PCM as a function of temperature using a heat‐flux DSC—A study of different measurement procedures and their accuracy

By C. Castellón, E. Günther, H. Mehling, S. Hiebler, L. F. Cabeza. 2008

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Thermal energy storage by latent heat allows storing high amounts of energy working in narrow margins of temperature. The use of phase change material (PCM) for the latent heat storage has been studied in different applications and it has been commercialized in containers to transport blood, products sensible to temperature, to decrease their energy demand. The use of PCM in cooling and refrigeration has been attracting a lot of interest lately, but for all applications, the properties of these materials need to be known with sufficient accuracy. Regarding heat storage, it is necessary to know the enthalpy as a function of temperature. The most widely used calorimeter is the heat‐flux differential scanning calorimetry (hf‐DSC). The objective of this study is to investigate different methods for hf‐DSC analysis, namely the dynamic method and the step method, and to test their accuracy in the determination of enthalpy–temperature relationship of PCM. For the dynamic method, a strong influence of heating/cooling rate was observed. For the step method, the resulting enthalpy–temperature relationship is independent of heating/cooling rate. Commercial PCM RT27 was chosen as sample material to avoid subcooling and kinetic effects in the test measurements. The approach introduced in this study can be used to carry out similar investigations for other classes of PCM and/or other DSC instruments. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9afb92963b8905abe4b77088f475505a93f26c21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. B. Zalba
  2. L. F. Cabeza
  3. A. Lázaro

In Mechanical Engineering

  1. A. Lázaro
  2. L. F. Cabeza
  3. B. Zalba
  4. Yongsheng Lian
  5. E. Brehob
  6. Stephen D. Zwanzig
  7. A. Solé
  8. Ahmet Sari

Citations in the corpus