Learning strategies in table tennis using inverse reinforcement learning
By Katharina Muelling, Abdeslam Boularias, Betty J. Mohler, Bernhard Schölkopf, Jan Peters. 2014
81 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Control and Systems Engineering, Economics and Econometrics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Lerrel Pinto
- Trevor Darrell
- Ruslan Salakhutdinov
- Yoshua Bengio
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Sergey Levine
- Chelsea Finn
- Pieter Abbeel
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Lerrel Pinto
- Jitendra Malik
- Dhiraj Gandhi
- Vikash Kumar
In Economics and Econometrics
Citations in the corpus
- Visual Imitation Made Easy (2020, methodology): “Kinesthetic demonstrations, in which the expert actively controls the robot arm by exerting force on it, is an effective method [25, 10] of collecting robot manipulation demonstrations for playing ping pong [26] and cutting vegetables [27].”
- Guided Cost Learning: Deep Inverse Optimal Control via Policy Optimization (2016, background): “…a robotic ball-in-cup game (Boularias et al., 2011), learning table tennis with features that include distance of the ball to the opponent’s elbow (Muelling et al., 2014), providing the goal position as a known constraint for robotic grasping (Doerr et al., 2015), and learning highway driving…”
- Learning from Demonstration for Shaping through Inverse Reinforcement Learning (2016, background): “Depending on the task, if demonstrating the goal state carries importance one could prefer to append a repetition of the goal state in the set of demonstrated observations, or otherwise prune the observations.”