Biotechnology or organic? Extensive or intensive? Global or local? A critical review of potential pathways to resolve the global food crisis

By Evan D. G. Fraser, Alexander F. Legwegoh, K. Kc, Michael CoDyre, G. Dias, Shelley Hazen, Rylea Johnson, Ralph C. Martin, Lisa Ohberg, Sridharan Sethuratnam and 6 more. 2016

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Food Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ac2407afcde2d8b75f44bcbc0eaea94f64ad350

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. C. Kremen
2. Loren H. Rieseberg
3. Katharina Waha
4. Navin Ramankutty
5. Mario Herrero

In Plant Science

1. C. Kremen
2. Loren H. Rieseberg
3. L. Wenz
4. Matthias Kalkuhl
5. Navin Ramankutty
6. N. Williams
7. S. Potts
8. R. Winfree

Citations in the corpus

• Trends in Global Agricultural Land Use: Implications for Environmental Health and Food Security. (2018, background): “Genetic engineering versus organic farming Another widespread and passionate debate in the scientific community is on the role of Genetically Modified (GM) foods versus organic farming in navigating pathways to sustainable food systems (55).”
• Teleconnected food supply shocks (2016, background): “The use of food crops or agricultural land for biofuel production has been identified as a major concern for food security (Tilman et al 2009, Creutzig et al 2015, Fraser et al 2016), reducing the supply of major exporting countries (ad i).”