Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections

By S. I. Guler, M. Menéndez, L. Meier. 2014

465 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Urban traffic signal control with connected and automated vehicles: A survey (2019, background): “In addition, it may be relatively easier for SVCC to transfer to non-signal control (with proper safety guarantees) when 100% CAVs is achieved in the traffic system, which may further improve the performances of traffic control.”
Energy saving potentials of connected and automated vehicles (2018, background): “Also because automated cars have much faster reaction times than human driven vehicles, the intersection controller can rapidly switch between phases [172].”
A platoon based cooperative eco-driving model for mixed automated and human-driven vehicles at a signalised intersection (2018, background): “If not, it can be estimated by using loop detectors (Treiber and Kesting, 2014; Guler et al., 2014; He et al., 2015) or connected vehicles (Yang et al., 2017; Zheng and Liu, 2017). h denotes the safety time headway of an AV with its preceding vehicle.”
Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research (2017, background): “Ilgin Guler, Menendez, and Meier (2014) assumed that only a portion of the vehicles were equipped with their intersection control algorithm and tested the impacts on delays for two one-way-streets.”