IS OYSTER SHELL A SUSTAINABLE ESTUARINE RESOURCE?

By E. Powell, J. Klinck. 2007

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9abb3ef2c2ea0e773fb463997534b005e9e67b5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. G. Waldbusser
2. Mark A. Green
3. Ryan A. Steenson
4. David Bushek
5. S. Ford
6. D. Aldridge
7. M. Wilberg
8. C. Gobler

In Oceanography

1. G. Waldbusser
2. Mark A. Green
3. Ryan A. Steenson
4. S. Ford
5. D. Aldridge
6. C. Gobler
7. A. Stevens

Citations in the corpus

• Oyster Shell Dissolution Rates in Estuarine Waters: Effects of pH and Shell Legacy (2011, background): “Powell and Klinck (2007) argue that these loss rates should set the target population dynamics needed for self-sustaining populations.”
• Sustainable Intensification of Aquaculture through Nutrient Recycling and Circular Economies: More Fish, Less Waste, Blue Growth (2021, background): “Shells discarded by bivalve aquaculture can be used for treatment of soil acidity, livestock calcium supplements, construction materials, natural substrates, alkalinity buffers for wild reefs and restoration programs (Powell and Klinck 2007; Morris et al. 2019).”
• Overfishing, disease, habitat loss, and potential extirpation of oysters in upper Chesapeake Bay (2011, background): “The maximum sustainable exploitation rate may be 7% because Powell & Klinck (2007) did not include direct effects of fishing on habitat, which can be substantial (Lenihan & Peterson 1998, 2004).”
• Long-term Trends in Oyster Population Dynamics in Delaware Bay: Regime Shifts and Response to Disease (2008, background): “Oyster shell degrades relatively rapidly, with shell halflives on the order of 3–10 y being commonplace (Powell et al. 2006) and comparable to oyster generation times (Powell & Klinck 2007).”
• WHY OYSTER RESTORATION GOALS IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY ARE NOT AND PROBABLY CANNOT BE ACHIEVED (2007, unknown): “…the natural environment as they are influenced by the process of shell gain and loss and these processes can be substantial on decadal time frames (Powell et al. 2007, Powell & Klinck 2007, Powell et al. 1995) and the goal of diverting, derailing or delaying this process likely cannot be fulfilled.”
• Death by dissolution: Sediment saturation state as a mortality factor for juvenile bivalves (2009, background): “Others have suggested shell addition as a viable and important management strategy for oysters and clams, due to the structural complexity shell provides (Guiterrez et al. 2003; Kraeuter et al. 2003; Powell and Klinck 2007).”