Can Financial Markets Be Tapped to Help Poor People Cope with Weather Risks
By J. Skees, Panos Varangis, Donald F. Larson, Paul B. Siegel. 2002
151 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Poor households in rural areas are particularly vulnerable to risks that reduce incomes and increase expenditures. Most past research has focused on risk-coping strategies for the rural poor, specially on micro-level and household actions. These are risks that can been shared within a community or extended family. These strategies are effective for independent risks, but ineffective for covariate or systemic risks. The authors focus on private and public mechanisms for managing covariate risk for natural disasters. When many households within the same community face risks that create losses for all, traditional coping mechanisms are likely to fail. Such covariate risks are not uncommon in many developing countries, especially where farming remains a major source of income. The authors focus on risks related to weather events (such as excess rain, droughts, freezes, and high winds) that have a severe impact on rural incomes. Weather insurance could cover the covariate risk for a community of poor households through formal and informal risk-sharing arrangements among households that are purchasing these weather contracts. Given recent Mexican innovations targeted at helping the poor cope with catastrophe weather events, the authors use Mexico as a case study. In Mexico, poor households are exposed to systemic risks, such as droughts and floods, that affect the economic livelihood of their region. Catastrophic insurance is useful for small farmers, although commercially oriented small farmers may wish to obtain coverage for less catastrophic events. Weather insurance could meet this need. It pays out according to the frequency and intensity of specific weather events. Because weather insurance depends on the occurrences and objective measure of intensity of a specific event, it does not require individual farm inspection that can be very costly for small farm. The authors argue that a key issue of delivering insurance to small farmers is the existence of producer organizations. In Mexico, the farmer mutual insurance funds provide a good example. These funds provide insurance to their members by pulling together resources to pay for future indemnities and reinsures itself from major systemic risks that could hurt simultaneously all their members.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ab890e6f5f50265ebd1020a61ee6d391ff8f405
Citations in the corpus
- Vulnerability: A Micro Perspective (2006, unknown): “Whether products for weather or catastrophic risk can be introduced in some of the poorest countries remains to be seen, although there is some encouraging evidence emerging (Skees et al., 2004).”
- Poverty Traps and Climate Risk: Limitations and Opportunities of Index-Based Risk Financing (2007, unknown): “Working Paper Poverty Traps and Climate Risk: Limitations and Opportunit ies of Index-Based Risk Financing 13 Stoppa, and Richter 2002; Hess et al. 2005; Skees et al. 2001, 2005; Skees, Hazell, and Miranda 1999; Skees, Barnett, and Hartell 2005; Skees and EnkhAmgalan 2002; Mahul and Skees 2006)).”