Does parasitic infection impair the ability of bumblebees to learn flower-handling techniques?
By Robert J. Gegear, Michael C. Otterstatter, James D. Thomson. 2005
104 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ab4898765bc0fc1c31d86e65bf24beaf365f43e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Genetics
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Mitigating the anthropogenic spread of bee parasites to protect wild pollinators (2015, background): “Commercial colonies of B. terrestris are commonly infected with one or more parasites that are infectious and virulent to native bumble bees and to honeybees, including Nosema bombi, N. ceranae, Apicystis bombi, the mite Locustacarus buchneri and DWV (Whittington and Winston, 2003; Gegear et al., 20”
- Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success (2009, unknown): “…given that there is a connection between levels of parasitism and cognitive functions such as learning and decision making (Kavaliers et al. 1995; Gegear et al. 2005, 2006), offspring of cognitively superior males may inherit greater parasite resistance (Buchanan et al. 1999; Spencer et al.…”
- Factors affecting parasite prevalence among wild bumblebees (2010, background): “These managed colonies often have high levels of infection by Crithidia and Nosema (Gegear et al., 2005), thereby potentially increasing infection rates for wild bumblebee individuals foraging nearby.”