Nerdy Money: Bitcoin, the Private Digital Currency, and the Case Against Its Regulation

By Nikolei M. Kaplanov. 2012

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Media Technology, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ab053e7f9f7e2caed382a426b9fb0e1b2fa71e2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

1. John Fry
2. Eng-Tuck Cheah
3. Jon Carrick
4. Andrew Urquhart
5. M. Gronwald
6. Tetsuya Takaishi
7. Adam S. Hayes
8. Paraskevi Katsiampa

In Media Technology

1. Eng-Tuck Cheah
2. John Fry
3. Jon Carrick

In Strategy and Management

1. Eng-Tuck Cheah
2. John Fry
3. Jon Carrick

Citations in the corpus

• Bitcoin as a Complement to Emerging Market Currencies (2016, background): “Ostensibly, the main fault governments find with it relates to fraud (Kaplanov 2012).”
• Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions (2017, unknown): “This data is updated by a decentral network consisting of private computers of individuals that participate in the bitcoin network (Kaplanov 2012).”
• Negative bubbles and shocks in cryptocurrency markets (2016, background): “Inter alia a large legal literature (see e.g. Kaplanov, 2012; Dion, 2013; Bryans, 2014; Doguet, 2012; Varriale, 2013; Yang, 2013; Twomey, 2013) thus reflects both a variety of ethical concerns raised by Bitcoin and a diverse international experience (Van Alstyne, 2014; Pilkington, 2014).”
• Bitcoin: A Regulatory Nightmare to a Libertarian Dream (2014, unknown): “While some scholars have argued against the regulation of bitcoin (see, in particular, Kaplanov, 2012; and, more generally, Hughes & Middlebrook, 2014) on the grounds that governments should not have any control over the money supply (Hayek, 1976) unless necessary to ensure the security of…”