Feedbacks, Timescales, and Seeing Red

By G. Roe. 2009

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Oceanography, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9aadff62376b7ae15478592cccd63df6578c3509

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. S. Newbold
2. M. Zelinka
3. D. Hartmann
4. A. Marten

In Oceanography

1. S. Newbold
2. M. Zelinka
3. D. Hartmann
4. A. Marten

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. S. Newbold
2. M. Zelinka
3. D. Hartmann
4. A. Marten

Citations in the corpus

• Developing a Social Cost of Carbon for US Regulatory Analysis: A Methodology and Interpretation (2013, background): “First, the Roe and Baker distribution is the only distribution based on a theoretical understanding of the response of the climate system to increased GHG concentrations (Roe 2008; Roe and Baker 2007).”
• Climate Feedbacks and Their Implications for Poleward Energy Flux Changes in a Warming Climate (2011, methodology): “Also, unlike the formulation of Roe and Baker (2007) and Roe (2009) in which feedbacks are computed relative”
• Estimating the social cost of non-CO2 GHG emissions: Methane and nitrous oxide (2012, background): “Given the inherently non-linear relationship between these feedbacks and the temperature response of the climate, basic theory suggests that the probability density function for the equilibrium climate sensitivity will be heavily skewed towards high values (Roe and Baker, 2007; Roe, 2009), a feature”