PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP

By Cathy Macharis, Johan Springael, K. D. Brucker, Alain Verbeke. European Journal of Operational Research, 2004

858 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution (2021, background): “The resulting number of pairwise comparisons equals m 2−m 2 , becoming an arduous task as m increases (Macharis et al., 2004).”
Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: A Strategic Planning Tool for Water Loss Management (2011, methodology): “…PROMETHEE has some drawbacks that users must be aware of including lack of guidelines on how to determine criteria weights and it suffers from rank reversal on addition or removal of options particularly PROMETHEE II (De Keyser and Peeters 1996; Macharis et al. 2004; Mareschal et al. 2008).”
Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE (2007, methodology): “This method has some strengths in comparison with analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method [14], such as: the PROMETHEE I does not aggregate good scores on some criteria and bad scores on other criteria, it has less pairwise comparisons and it does not have the artificial limitation of the use of the”