Negative Cognitive Biases Predict Subsequent Depression

By S. Rude, C. Valdez, Susan Odom, A. Ebrahimi. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2003

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. (2005, background): “Production of negative sentences when under mental load predicted diagnoses of major depression 18–28 months later (Rude et al. 2003).”
Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory as Depression Vulnerability (2004, methodology): “Rude and Wenzlaff and their colleagues (e.g., Rude et al., 2003; Rude, Gortner, & Pennebaker, in press; Rude, Little, & Neff, 2004; Rude & McCarthy, 2003; Wenzlaff & Luxton, 2003; Wenzlaff, Rude, & West, 2002; Wenzlaff, Rude, Taylor, Staltz, & Sweat, 2001; Wenzlaff, Wegner, & Klein, 1991) have…”
Predicting Depression via Social Media (2013, unknown): “On the other hand, Rude et al., (2003) found support for the claim that negative processing biases, particularly (cognitive) biases in resolving ambiguous verbal information can predict subsequent depression.”
Developing interpretation bias modification as a "cognitive vaccine" for depressed mood: imagining positive events makes you feel better than thinking about them verbally. (2009, methodology): “However, depressive interpretation bias (as gauged by the SST) was more positive after imagery than verbal CBM-I, with means in a similar range to those reported by Rude et al. (2003).”