Chemical Characterisation of the USGS Reference Glasses GSA‐1G, GSC‐1G, GSD‐1G, GSE‐1G, BCR‐2G, BHVO‐2G and BIR‐1G Using EPMA, ID‐TIMS, ID‐ICP‐MS and LA‐ICP‐MS
By K. Jochum, M. Willbold, I. Raczek, B. Stoll, K. Herwig. 2005
531 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Geochemistry and Petrology, Geophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a9ea6f24fa11318839e51ad025cd0b8746e4914
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Geochemistry and Petrology
In Geophysics
Citations in the corpus
- The Preparation and Preliminary Characterisation of Three Synthetic Andesite Reference Glass Materials (ARM‐1, ARM‐2, ARM‐3) for In Situ Microanalysis (2019, methodology): “The analytical procedure at MPI Mainz is given by Jochum et al. (2007). The analytical procedure at IGGCAS is similar as outlined by Wu et al. (2018b). All the LA-ICP-MS measurements used NIST SRM 610 as the calibration material and Ca as the internal standard.”
- In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard (2008, methodology): “, 1997), USGS (BCR-2G, BHVO-2G and BIR-1G) (Jochum et al., 2005) and MPIDING (ATHO-G, GOR128-G, GOR132-G, KL2-G, ML3B-G, StHs6/80-G”