Transfer via inter-task mappings in policy search reinforcement learning
By Matthew E. Taylor, Shimon Whiteson, Peter Stone. 2007
147 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Matthew E. Taylor
- Peter Stone
- Karl Tuyls
- Eric Eaton
- Gerhard Weiss
- Haitham Bou-Ammar
- Shimon Whiteson
- Gregory Kuhlmann
Citations in the corpus
- Transfer Learning for Reinforcement Learning Domains: A Survey (2009, background): “While choosing a range of thresholds to compare over may produce more representative measures (cf., Taylor et al., 2007b), this leads to having to generating a time vs. threshold curve rather than producing a single real valued number that evaluates a transfer algorithm’s efficacy.”
- Policy Transfer using Reward Shaping (2015, background): “the use of an old policy to speed up learning in a new task, without any reference to a low level algorithm-specific representation of that policy [6, 22].”
- Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems Manuscript No. Learning Potential Functions and Their Representations for Multi-task Reinforcement Learning (unknown): “[78] learn rules that summarize a learned source task policy and incorporate these as an extra action in the target task, to be learned by a policy-search method.”
- Reinforcement Learning Transfer Using a Sparse Coded Inter-task Mapping (2011, background): “For example, semantic knowledge about state features between two tasks may be used [8, 5], background knowledge about the range or type of state variables can be used [13, 17], or transition models for each possible mapping could be generated and tested [14].”
- Autonomous transfer for reinforcement learning (2008, background): “[20] M. E. Taylor, P. Stone, and Y. Liu.”
- Automatically Mapped Transfer between Reinforcement Learning Tasks via Three-Way Restricted Boltzmann Machines (2013, background): “For example, semantic knowledge about state features between two tasks may be used [8,10], background knowledge about the range or type of state variables can be used [14,19], or transition models for each possible mapping could be generated and tested [16].”
- Unsupervised Cross-Domain Transfer in Policy Gradient Reinforcement Learning via Manifold Alignment (2015, background): “All rights reserved. when the source and target tasks have different state and/or action spaces, an inter-task mapping (Taylor et al. 2007a) that describes the relationship between the two tasks is typically needed.”
- Mapping and Revising Markov Logic Networks for Transfer Learning (2007, background): “It has been studied for a variety of problems, including text classification (Raina, Ng, & Koller 2006) and reinforcement learning (Torrey et al. 2005; Taylor, Whiteson, & Stone 2007 ).”