Not by the Book Facebook as a Sampling Frame
By C. B. Bhutta. 2012
325 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a5594c4976098afb1b8e1f3e239a7cd36c16524
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- Justin T. Pickett
- Amanda Graham
- Andrew J. Thompson
- Valeria Lo Iacono
- F. Cullen
- Paul Symonds
- D. Brown
- Mick Couper
In Sociology and Political Science
- Justin T. Pickett
- F. Cullen
- Amanda Graham
- Michal Kosinski
- David J. Stillwell
- Andrew J. Thompson
- Valeria Lo Iacono
- Paul Symonds
Citations in the corpus
- Participant recruitment and data collection through Facebook: the role of personality factors1 (2016, background): “Numerous studies (Brickman Bhutta, 2012; Burnap, Avis, & Rana, 2013; Casler, Bickel, & Hackett, 2013; Ramo & Prochaska, 2012; Smith, 2012) have examined the possibility of using social media for participant recruitment and questionnaire administration.”
- The Future of Modes of Data Collection (2011, background): “To get around this, researchers may limit the comparisons to volunteer subjects in a lab setting (e.g., Chang and Krosnick 2010).”
- Are Relational Inferences from Crowdsourced and Opt-in Samples Generalizable? Comparing Criminal Justice Attitudes in the GSS and Five Online Samples (2019, background): “Bhutta (2012) made a similar recommendation.”
- Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews (2016, methodology): “…a topic of enquiry include: online ethnographies (Beneito-Montagut 2011; Garcia et al. 2009; Kozinets 2009); blogs analysis (Hookway 2008; Rettberg 2008); Facebook as a research tool and source of data (Baker 2013; Baltar & Brunet 2012; Brickman Bhutta 2012;Taylor et al. 2014; Wilson et al. 2012).”
- Advantages of Matched Over Unmatched Opt-in Samples for Studying Criminal Justice Attitudes: A Research Note (2020, result): “…Current Population Survey (Simmons & Bobo, 2015).5 Other studies find that when compared against each other, there often are as many inconsistencies in results between different probability samples as between opt-in samples and probability samples (Ansolabehere & Schaffner, 2014; Bhutta, 2012).”