Analyzing communities and their evolutions in dynamic social networks
By Yu-Ru Lin, Yun Chi, Shenghuo Zhu, Hari Sundaram, Belle L. Tseng. TKDD, 2009
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a3153e4176049d743238a4e0be050043f93bd30
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
In Transportation
- Huan Liu
- Lei Tang
- Tianbao Yang
- Bryan Perozzi
- Charu C. Aggarwal
- Chengqi Zhang
- Xingquan Zhu
- Daokun Zhang
Citations in the corpus
- Community Detection and Mining in Social Media (2010, methodology): “A similar evolutionary clustering scheme has been instantiated with different community detection methods, including latent space models (Sarkar and Moore, 2005), probabilistic soft clustering (Lin et al., 2009), block model approximation (Yang et al.”
- Detecting communities and their evolutions in dynamic social networks—a Bayesian approach (2011, methodology): “Lin et al. (2008, 2009a) extended the graph-factorization clustering (GFC) and proposed the FacetNet algorithm for analyzing dynamic communities.”
- Community Discovery in Dynamic Networks (2017, unknown): “parts of the communities. The stable community cores, less unstable than raw community partitions, can be more eciently tracked. Explicit smoothing. Some algorithms (e.g., (Folino and Pizzuti, 2014; Lin et al., 2009)) explicitly introduce smoothing in their denition, requiring the partition found at”