The Astronomical Journal
By Yuntao Bai, Jifeng Liu, Z. Bai, Song Wang, Dongwei Fan. 2019
Subfields: AI for Physical Sciences
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- K. Migkas
- Hantian Zhang
- G. Schellenberger
- Ce Zhang
- L. Lovisari
- F. Pacaud
- T. Reiprich
- M. Ramos-Ceja
Citations in the corpus
- Generative Adversarial Networks recover features in astrophysical images of galaxies beyond the deconvolution limit (2017, background): “MNRASL 467, L110–L114 (2017) D ow nloaded from https://academ ic.oup.com /m nrasl/article-abstract/467/1/L110/2931732 by guest on 18 February 2020 (Richardson 1972; Lucy 1974)3 achieves a PSNR of 18.7 dB.”
- Improving the open cluster census. II. An all-sky cluster catalogue with Gaia DR3 (2023, methodology): “(2021) and Tarricq et al. (2022) have shown that many nearby OCs have tidal tails or comas of ejected member stars indicative of their ongoing tidal disruption by the Milky Way. Other works such as Bossini et al. (2019) and Cantat-Gaudin et al. (2020) have used Gaia photometry to infer cluster ages,”
- Probing cosmic isotropy with a new X-ray galaxy cluster sample through the LX–T scaling relation (2020, background): “Another possible explanation for the behavior of the low-A regions would be the existence of nearby dwarf galaxies (e.g., McConnachie 2012), that contain sufficient amounts of X-ray absorbing material to cause such dimming to the clusters, for which we do not account for.”