Effects of growing conditions and source habitat on plant traits and functional group definition

By Dyer A. R., Goldberg D. E., T. R, S. C.. 2001

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99f1b61baa50edb1db27c2edc9809591ddbc87d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? (2007, background): “Growing numbers of experiments have confirmed this assumption for responses to single environmental factors such as nutrient availability (Dyer et al. 2001) or grazing (Bullock et al. 2001), as do models of community or ecosystem dynamics (Pausas 1999, Colasanti et al. 2001, Ackerly 2003, Boer &…”
Locating eutrophication effects across British vegetation between 1990 and 1998 (2003, background): “This would favour species typical of more fertile conditions because these also tend to be taller species that are better able to compete successfully for light (Weiher et al., 1999; Dyer et al., 2001).”
Intraspecific functional variability: extent, structure and sources of variation (2010, background): “Journal compilation 2010 British Ecological Society studies have been published investigating, on a regional to global scale, the response of functional, ecophysiological or demographic traits to environmental gradients (Cordell et al. 1998; Meziane & Shipley 1999; Reich et al. 1999; Ryser & Aeschli”
Root nutrient concentration and biomass allocation are more plastic than morphological traits in response to nutrient limitation (2017, background): “allocation to root biomass under nutrient limitation (Cromer and Jarvis 1990; Dyer et al. 2001; Grassein et al. 2010; Hill et al. 2006; Louw-Gaume et al. 2010; Poorter et al. 2012).”
Climate change in the Arctic: using plant functional types in a meta‐analysis of field experiments (2002, background): “A desirable next step would be the creation of a PFT classification primarily based on species’ responses to various environmental manipulations (e.g. Dyer et al. 2001).”