Status of moose populations and challenges to moose management in Fennoscandia.

By S. Lavsund, T. Nygrén, E. Solberg. 2003

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99eca57f2fa2e87a1aa18dc7e4895c66247d50bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. E. Solberg
2. Kari Bjørneraas
3. Bram Van Moorter
4. I. Herfindal
5. C. Skarpe
6. B. Sæther
7. J. Tremblay
8. T. Myking

Citations in the corpus

• Moose Alces alces habitat use at multiple temporal scales in a human-altered landscape (2011, background): “This can have negative consequences for the moose condition in areas where highmoose density has already resulted in a high browsing pressure, deteriorating forage quality, declining bodymass, and lower recruitment rates (Hjeljord & Histøl 1999, Lavsund et al. 2003).”
• Life history strategies of aspen (Populus tremula L.) and browsing effects: a literature review (2011, background): “This corresponds with the period of peak population density of moose in Norway ( Lavsund et al. , 2003 ), indicating that the younger cohorts recorded in the survey have been exposed to substantially higher browsing pressure when saplings than the older cohorts.”