Rising Food Prices and Household Welfare: Evidence from Brazil in 2008
By Francisco H. G. Ferreira, Anna Fruttero, P. Leite, L. Lucchetti. Social Science Research Network, 2011
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Food price inflation in Brazil in the twelve months to June 2008 was 18 percent, while overall inflation was seven percent. Using spatially disaggregated monthly data on consumer prices and two different household surveys, we estimate the welfare consequences of these food price increases, and their distribution across households. Because Brazil is a large food producer, with a predominantly wage-earning agricultural labor force, our estimates include general equilibrium effects on market and transfer incomes, as well as the standard estimates of changes in consumer surplus. While the expenditure (or consumer surplus) effects were large, negative and markedly regressive everywhere, the market income effect was positive and progressive, particularly in rural areas. Because of this effect on the rural poor, and of the partial protection afforded by increases in two large social assistance benefits, the overall impact of higher food prices in Brazil was U-shaped, with middle-income groups suffering larger proportional losses than the very poor. Nevertheless, since Brazil is 80 percent urban, higher food prices still led to a greater incidence and depth of poverty at the national level.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99dff4529b9bcd75d26fc296dcbbd907584399ba
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Self-Reported Food Insecurity in Africa During the Food Price Crisis (2013, background): “The survey rounds of 2005 4 Afrobarometer is a research project funded by Institute for Democracy in South Africa, the Ghana Centre for Democratic Development and the Department of Political Science at the Michigan State University.”