Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption
By Jana Kunicová, S. Rose-Ackerman. British Journal of Political Science, 2005
580 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99d70df3ca706aba7dd9ec79c2415c7225952a55
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- D. Treisman
- P. Ngo
- Wai-Man Liu
- Rajeev Kumar Goel
- Stephen F. Knack
- Christian Bjørnskov
- Toke S. Aidt
- Michael T. Rock
Citations in the corpus
- Elections, Political Competition and Bank Failure (2014, background): “See for example, Kunicova and Rose-Ackerman (2005), Lederman, Loayza, and Soares (2005), Tavits (2007), and Nyblade and Reed (2008).”
- What Have We Learned About the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-National Empirical Research? (2007, background): “Kunicová & Rose-Ackerman (2005) confirm this and find that presidentialism is particularly harmful when combined with closed-list proportional representation (PR) in legislative elections.”
- Regulation and corruption (2015, unknown): “Similarly, Kunicová and Rose-Ackerman (2005) find that closed list parliamentary systems have less corruption and mixed systems with proportional representation attributes also exhibit less corruption than presidential systems.”
- Political Polarization as a Constraint on Corruption: A Cross-national Comparison (2011, unknown): “According to Kunicová and Rose-Ackerman (2005), participation, political competition, and constraints on the chief executive all increase the ability of the population to monitor and legally constrain politicians from engaging in corrupt behavior.”