Collective Opinion Spam Detection: Bridging Review Networks and Metadata
By Shebuti Rayana, Leman Akoglu. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2015
747 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/99d67902a1c92f0feeda0e70c97a3f6136894a49
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
In Information Systems
In Signal Processing
- Jinyuan Jia
- Neil Zhenqiang Gong
- Binghui Wang
- Huan Liu
- Srijan Kumar
- Christos Faloutsos
- Neil Shah
- Zi-Chao Gao
Citations in the corpus
- False Information on Web and Social Media: A Survey (2018, methodology): “[79] used loopy belief propagation on the review graph network for identifying fake reviews, extending the idea of FraudEagle from Akoglu et al.”
- Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly Detection (2022, methodology): “The YelpChi dataset (Rayana & Akoglu, 2015) aims to find the anomalous reviews which un-justly promote or demote certain products or businesses on Yelp.com.”
- Misinformation in Social Media: Definition, Manipulation, and Detection (2019, background): “Based on the assumption, a supervised learning algorithm can clamp prediction results of a pair of friends [60; 43; 44; 32].”
- GANG: Detecting Fraudulent Users in Online Social Networks via Guilt-by-Association on Directed Graphs (2017, methodology): “Using undirected social graphs: Some guilt-by-association methods [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] assume symmetric relationships between nodes.”
- Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detection (2020, methodology): “We utilize the YelpChi spam review dataset [11], along with three other benchmark datasets [2, 7] to study the graph inconsistency problem in the fraud detection task.”
- Adversarial Attack and Defense on Graph Data: A Survey (2018, neutral): “Social Network Node/Link PolBlogs [1] 1,490 19,025 2 [145], [23], [8], [120], [19], [140], [22], [105] , [52], [53], [36], [134], [20], [54], [56], [77], [59], [135] Node/Link Facebook [65] [109], [21], [92], [143], [103] Node/Community Google+ [65] 107,614 13,673,453 [108], [109], [103] Node Reddit”
- Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud Detection (2021, background): “For example, in the real-world review dataset YelpChi [34] from Yelp.”
- REV2: Fraudulent User Prediction in Rating Platforms (2018, methodology): “• SpEagle [26] incorporates behavior features (user, rating text, and product) into FraudEagle, and the final spam scores of users are used for ranking.”
- Fake News: A Survey of Research, Detection Methods, and Opportunities (2018, background): “…for a reviewer among products ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Manuscript submitted to ACM (1) Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs) are frequently adopted either in directed setting (Bayesian Network, BN) [Hooi et al. 2016; Rayana and Akoglu 2016] or undirected setting (Markov Random Field, MRF) [Rayana and Akoglu 2015].”
- Automated Crowdturfing Attacks and Defenses in Online Review Systems (2017, background): “Similar to previous work [45, 48, 56], we treat Yelp filtered and unfiltered reviews as ground-truth information for fake and real reviews.”
- Call Attention to Rumors: Deep Attention Based Recurrent Neural Networks for Early Rumor Detection (2017, background): “Embedding social graphs into a classification model also helps distinguish malicious user comments from normal ones [20, 21].”
- Graph-based Security and Privacy Analytics via Collective Classification with Joint Weight Learning and Propagation (2018, methodology): “Yelp: We obtained a Yelp dataset from [25], which contains Yelp reviews for restaurants located in New York City.”
- Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsters (2020, methodology): “Since the Yelp dataset has imbalanced classes, and we focus more on fraudsters (positive instances), like previous work [29], we utilize ROC-AUC (AUC) and Recall to evaluate the overall performance of all classifiers.”