Brief interventions for alcohol problems: a meta-analytic review of controlled investigations in treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking populations.

By A. Moyer, J. Finney, Carolyn E Swearingen, P. Vergun. Addiction, 2002

1,027 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. (2006, neutral): “Nevertheless, a decline in the positive effects of CM after reinforcement has been discontinued is to be expected for CM specifically [66], and for other types of treatments [67].”
Behavioral Counseling Interventions in Primary Care To Reduce Risky/Harmful Alcohol Use by Adults: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2004, result): “Our results are consistent with recent reviews that found no important sex differences in outcomes of brief interventions (31, 36, 38).”
The efficacy of motivational interviewing as a brief intervention for excessive drinking: a meta-analytic review. (2006, background): “However, as Moyer et al. (2002) argued, although no interaction between gender and treatment outcome has been reported, it is possible that men and women benefit from different types of brief interventions, such as confrontational vs non-confrontational.”
Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) (2007, background): “(47) found positive evidence for the effectiveness of brief therapies, especially among patients with less severeproblems.”