Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence

By D. Vladeck. 2014

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Research Priorities for Robust and Beneficial Artificial Intelligence (2015, background): “In what legal framework can the safety benefits of autonomous vehicles such as drone aircraft and self-driving cars best be realized (Vladeck 2014)? Should legal questions about AI be handled by existing (software- and internet-focused) ‘‘cyberlaw’’, or should they be treated separately (Calo 2014b)”
The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles (2015, background): “Is it acceptable for an AV to avoid a motorcycle by swerving into a wall, considering that the probability of survival is greater for the passenger of the AV, than for the rider of the motorcycle? Should AVs take the ages of the passengers and pedestrians into account [20]? If a manufacturer offers ”
Explaining Explanations to Society (2019, background): “Similar recommendations in using explanations in law have been examined in promoting ethics for design [23], for privacy [24], and liability for machines [33].”