Carbon Taxes and Carbon Emissions Trading

By Paul Ekins, T. Barker. 2002

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9975052d908927bbad8170cd6932ba7706feee67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Adam Bumpus
2. T. Barker
3. D. Liverman
4. R. Mabugu
5. David Gibbs
6. J. Blignaut
7. Nicholas Bardsley
8. Reyer Gerlagh

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. T. Barker
2. D. Liverman
3. R. Mabugu
4. David Gibbs
5. J. Blignaut
6. Adam Bumpus
7. Nicholas Bardsley
8. Reyer Gerlagh

Citations in the corpus

• Accumulation by Decarbonization and the Governance of Carbon Offsets (2008, background): “In generating a price for carbon, it is argued, an incentive is created to reduce emissions as efficiently as possible (Ekins and Barker 2001; Weyant 1999).”
• Searching for Triple Dividends in South Africa: Fighting CO2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth (2006, background): “…dividend studies that mention the distributional effects of green tax reform, they usually do not go much further than stating that a possible gain as a result of a more efficient tax system could be redistributed to attain a more equal income distribution (on this also see Ekins and Barker, 2001).”
• Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies (2011, background): “With this option, regressive effects can be considerably reduced or even reversed as several studies have demonstrated (Baranzini et al., 2000; Dresner and Ekins, 2006; Ekins and Barker, 2001; Ekins and Dresner, 2004).”
• From sustainable development to carbon control: Eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development (2010, background): “The argument is that the commodification of carbon within a global cap offers a clear incentive to reduce emissions to agreed levels (Ekins and Barker 2001), with the common principle being that any increase in carbon use from one source must be offset by decreases from another; those who decrease t”
• Triple dividends of water consumption charges in South Africa (2007, unknown): “The scarce information we do have points in the direction of a small negative distributional effect, but this, of course, depends on the specific form of the tax return [see, e.g., Ekins and Barker, 2001; Bach et al., 2002].”
• The Costs of Kyoto for the US Economy (2004, background): “Ekins and Barker (2001) for a recent review.”