Support for rural tourism does it make a difference

By A. Fleischer, Daniel Felsenstein. 2000

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Sociology and Political Science, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/996c7bcf2495a44bf014408777675f510a9ce203

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. G. Clark
2. J. Saarinen
3. B. Ilbery
4. Mary Chabrel
5. K. Tervo

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Clark
2. J. Saarinen
3. B. Ilbery
4. Mary Chabrel
5. K. Tervo

In Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

1. J. Saarinen
2. B. Ilbery

Citations in the corpus

• Conceptualizing Integrated Rural Tourism (2007, background): “If one is to take seriously the multi-dimensionality of IRT as both a social practice and an economic sector, one must study the range of actors involved in tourism’s development with their distinctive self-interests and goals.”
• The Regional Economics of Tourism in Northern Finland: The Socio-economic Implications of Recent Tourism Development and Future Possibilities for Regional Development (2003, methodology): “Especially in peripheral and rural areas tourism has been used as a tool for economic growth, welfare and promoting jobs (see Fleischer & Felsenstein, 2000).”
• Rural tourism: A systematic literature review on definitions and challenges (2021, unknown): “Several papers, such as Fleischer and Felsenstein (2000), Ghaderi and Henderson (2012), L. Huang (2006), Situmorang et al. (2019), Skuras et al. (2006) relied on these concepts to define both rural area and RT. Location was related to ‘rural areas ’ for 52.53% of the articles within this theme,…”